21 April 2010


How Brokeback Mountain lied...

Here's the passage from Annie Proulx's short story "Brokeback Mountain" in which the two men have their very first sexual encounter, after Jack invites Ennis to share Jack's pup tent and blanket on a cold night:

It was big enough, warm enough, and in a little while they deepened their intimacy considerably. Ennis ran full throttle on all roads whether fence mending or money spending, and he wanted none of it when Jack seized his left hand and brought it to his erect cock. Ennis jerked his hand away as though he'd touched fire, got to his knees, unbuckled his belt, shoved his pants down, hauled Jack onto all fours, and, with the help of the clear slick and a little spit, entered him, nothing he'd done before but no instruction manual needed. They went at it in silence except for a few sharp intakes of breath and Jack's choked 'Gun's goin off,' then out, down, and asleep.

The first thing that should be obvious to any critical eye is that Ms. Proulx has never in her life been anally penetrated, and that she most likely "researched" the scene by watching a few gay pr0n videos.

The second thing that should be obvious is that if a heterosexual male author had written a short romance between cowboy Ennis and cowgirl Jill, and Ennis had initiated their sexual affair by "hauling Jill onto all fours" and roughly fucking her in the anus using only spit and precum as lube, and the entire thing were presented as sweet and romantic, it probably never have become an Oscar-nominated movie. Because odds are, the New Yorker wouldn't have printed the short story in the first place.

Because a "romantic" scene in which cowgirl Jill gets forcefully buttfucked doggie-style -- and keeps coming back to cowboy Ennis for more -- would have (quite reasonably) struck too many readers as one of misogynist violence (and/or a commentary on battered-wife syndrome). For this to have occurred as the opening sequence to a decades-long romance would've seemed "retro" not merely in the "Eisenhower era" sense, but rather, caveman retro.

And that's because when anal sex is placed in a heterosexual context, everyone immediately understands that if it's going to be done it all, it must be done very gently, and with lots of lube.

Hi, Throbert dah-ling!

A riveting take on the retro theme.

You really must begin blogging on a regular basis.....

.......with the themes, as well as other ones, that you illuminate at IGF.
What is this, I don't even ...
This is the most ridiculous blog on the net I've encountered.

Ass politics? REALLY?
Um, I may be wrong, but I don't think the initial sexual act in the movie is where the romance lied. Not that anal sex can't be romantic or loving, but in THAT movie the romance between the two men developed after the act.
It makes gay men "exotic" - they have rough, animalistic sex! They're so completely different from us, in that they have crazy angry, militaristic, overtly male sex. They're viewing male homosexuality as the same as heterosexuality, but without women (and hence nothing but angry, male violence). They're defining male homosexuality in heterosexual terms.

(Which is hilarious since the same people can think of gay men, especially "bottoms", as also being somehow fake men AND OH HEY CONTRADICTORY FORMS OF HETERONORMATIVITY THAT SIMULTANEOUSLY GET BELIEVED).

Honestly the same line of thought gets followed in reverse with Lesbians - bed death (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lesbian_bed_death) and all.

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]